Skip to main content

The Government has Failed the North

While we're all focusing our attention on Brexit, we must also make sure we're aware of our domestic affairs, and in fact need to be more aware of where blame lays for changes to our region.

We should be able to identify the culprits of our region's problems, and the people making the political decisions, and whether we think they're necessary. It is a Tory Government decision to de-fund the north. Austerity is a political choice that was made by this Government, and these numbers show that the north has been suffering the brunt of these so that more prosperous regions, regions where people are already doing better off, and where life expectancy and education outcome is already better, can see increases in public spending, and these increases show that the de-funding of the public sector that the north has seen are not necessary.

The North has seen a drop in public spending of 3.4%, worth £6.3 billion, compared to an increase in the South of 2%, worth £3.2 billion. Cuts in a region where pay has fallen most dramatically, where people are dying earlier, and becoming seriously ill earlier.

This shouldn't be used to create division between the North and the South; we are one country and we are united, but it should be used to see that the Government has abandoned the North, and is creating division. This shortfall is not the result of natural phenomena, it is the result of our region being abandoned by our Government, and we should be aware of that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts on Labour's manifesto

Introduction. Spending commitments. Addressing climate change. Broadband as modern infrastructure investment. Education for life. Regressive policies. Where is the welfare system? Raising revenue. 95% is a good and untruthful line. Corporate tax. Worker’s shares policy is a second corporate tax. The average citizen and tax. Issues of personal interest. Brexit policy. Council tax. Trust on foreign policy. Paternity leave. Conclusion. Introduction. The 2019 Labour manifesto has been met with the support of 160 economists and the adoration of the party rank and file. It is a bold document designed to attack - and attack hard - in order to make up the current gap in the polls between Labour and the Conservatives. Contrast this with the Conservatives, who have chosen to put out a manifesto sparse on content and detail, presumably hoping to ride their current lead through to December 12th.  While the manifesto is clearly radical in the rate of spending increases...

Iain Duncan Smith and Owen Paterson have conspired to thwart Parliament

During the tumultuous events within Westminster two weeks ago, the Guardian broke the news that Iain Duncan Smith, Owen Patterson, and an unnamed non-cabinet MP have been engaged in talks with right-wing EU governments with the intention of lobbying them to veto the UK’s request for an extension to article 50 should Parliament vote in favour of such an action, as indeed it did. We should be clear about what these elected representatives, who are meant to serve the interests of their constituents, and the people of the United Kingdom, were doing. They have decided to ally themselves with the likes of Victor Orban, who has treated asylum seekers as animals , and the Polish government, which has all but forced the resignation of their country’s top judges in a bidt   to eliminate the rule of law. Of course, Government’s present and past have done the same,   due to both geopolitical matters and a long history of alliance.our shared history . Relationships with other states ...

Internal Market bill

Unfortunately, the country has once again found itself in the midst of another Brexit debate. Perhaps this was inevitable - both the UK and the EU seem to have chosen brinkmanship as their negotiation tactic of choice, both in negotiating the Withdrawal Agreement last year, and in negotiating two party’s parties’ future relationship now. That we’ve reached a similar impasse to that we saw last year is unsurprising. What is more surprising is the way that the situation seems to have followed the logic of a lazy television series. Each successive series finale raises the stakes higher and higher; the action becomes more and more implausible. As last year, we have all of the concerns of lines of thousands of lorries at Dover, damage to just-in-time supply chains, food prices skyrocketing, and harm to businesses and jobs in the UK that rely on trade with the EU. What renders this situation different from that in which we found ourselves last year is the Internal Market bill, a piece of l...