Skip to main content

The Government has Failed the North

While we're all focusing our attention on Brexit, we must also make sure we're aware of our domestic affairs, and in fact need to be more aware of where blame lays for changes to our region.

We should be able to identify the culprits of our region's problems, and the people making the political decisions, and whether we think they're necessary. It is a Tory Government decision to de-fund the north. Austerity is a political choice that was made by this Government, and these numbers show that the north has been suffering the brunt of these so that more prosperous regions, regions where people are already doing better off, and where life expectancy and education outcome is already better, can see increases in public spending, and these increases show that the de-funding of the public sector that the north has seen are not necessary.

The North has seen a drop in public spending of 3.4%, worth £6.3 billion, compared to an increase in the South of 2%, worth £3.2 billion. Cuts in a region where pay has fallen most dramatically, where people are dying earlier, and becoming seriously ill earlier.

This shouldn't be used to create division between the North and the South; we are one country and we are united, but it should be used to see that the Government has abandoned the North, and is creating division. This shortfall is not the result of natural phenomena, it is the result of our region being abandoned by our Government, and we should be aware of that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Government must take on the burden of challenging inflation

The influence of the state on the economy is legitimised through two main aims: increasing the options available to the individual – and hence their liberty – by securing broad-based prosperity, and addressing externalities and frictions that the market cannot address, thereby also increasing prosperity, increasing the options open to individuals, and protecting individuals from unreasonable harm. These obligations create distinct pressures in the short-term and the medium-to-long-term. For the former, it is clear that right now, moves need to be made to address both the real-terms deprivation that households are experiencing and to address the closely related issue of excessive inflation that is rapidly eroding the value of people’s income. For the latter, the only sustainable way of improving broad-based prosperity is to increase productivity per hour worked, allowing incomes to grow or individuals to take increasing amounts of leisure time without sacrificing current living standard...

How government uses inflation to drive up costs

Politicians and political commentators are eager to focus on the consequences of tax changes - or constitution altering deals - on a household's income, not averse to seizing the initiative in debate on sums on the order of a few hundred pounds per year. And they should be. These few hundreds can be very important in personal budgeting, and in significantly improving or diminishing the standard of living for those most vulnerable in society. It's also a convenient vehicle for outlining key ideological differences between parties and describing to the electorate the party's vision for the distribution of responsibilities among society and the role the state should take. This seemingly stands in great contrast to matters like measuring inflation, which one might assume is devoid of areas of debate. Distinctions between RPI, CPI, and CPIh are not matters of great public concern, because it seems unreasonable to suggest that these distinctions are being exploited for pol...

Internal Market bill

Unfortunately, the country has once again found itself in the midst of another Brexit debate. Perhaps this was inevitable - both the UK and the EU seem to have chosen brinkmanship as their negotiation tactic of choice, both in negotiating the Withdrawal Agreement last year, and in negotiating two party’s parties’ future relationship now. That we’ve reached a similar impasse to that we saw last year is unsurprising. What is more surprising is the way that the situation seems to have followed the logic of a lazy television series. Each successive series finale raises the stakes higher and higher; the action becomes more and more implausible. As last year, we have all of the concerns of lines of thousands of lorries at Dover, damage to just-in-time supply chains, food prices skyrocketing, and harm to businesses and jobs in the UK that rely on trade with the EU. What renders this situation different from that in which we found ourselves last year is the Internal Market bill, a piece of l...